Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(parser): simplify parser test #16942

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

refactor(parser): simplify parser test #16942

merged 5 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

wangrunji0408
Copy link
Contributor

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

This PR removes crate sqlparser/test_runner and merges its code into a single file sqlparser/tests/parser_test.rs. This way, these test cases can be included when running cargo test -p risingwave_sqlparser.

This PR also uses libtest-mimic for a better UI, removes multistage apply-parser-test, do-apply-parser-test, and keeps update-parser-test only.

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 requested a review from TennyZhuang May 27, 2024 03:52
@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2024 03:52
@TennyZhuang TennyZhuang requested a review from xxchan May 27, 2024 04:34
Comment on lines +171 to +173
let update = std::env::var("UPDATE_PARSER_TEST").is_ok();
std::env::set_current_dir("tests/testdata").unwrap();

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about relying on expect_test to update result?

pub fn check(actual: Vec<TestCaseResult>, expect: expect_test::ExpectFile) {
let actual = serde_yaml::to_string(&actual).unwrap();
expect.assert_eq(&format!("# This file is automatically generated. See `src/frontend/planner_test/README.md` for more information.\n{}",actual));
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find that it's not a good idea to use expect_test as it can not show diff one case at a time. Multiple cases would mix together. I'm going to revert this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a known issue #10940 🤪

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mainly just blindly update the tests and rely on git diff to see what's changed.

@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 requested a review from xxchan May 28, 2024 05:27
Copy link
Member

@xxchan xxchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rubber stamp

@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 enabled auto-merge May 28, 2024 05:28
@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 added this pull request to the merge queue May 28, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9d371a1 May 28, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
@wangrunji0408 wangrunji0408 deleted the wrj/parser-test branch May 28, 2024 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants